
(Photo: maryatexitzero)
Thoughts on Manliness
I read a blog on manliness. It’s called The Art of Manliness. Though its decor reeks of cravats, old spice, and pipe smoke, it’s a decent blog and deserves its large readership. It teaches the modern man how to be manly in a era of unmanliness (this era of unmanliness, as you know, has a lot to do with Feminism). I initially found it humorous but the blog as a whole deals with the lack of manliness quite seriously. There were two posts that struck me: “The Writing on the Door” and “Nice Guys Don’t Have to Finish Last”. The first article was written by Angela Bailey and she discusses the dilemma she often faces whenever she and a man approach a door at the same time:
I’m never sure what he’s thinking at this point, but I know I have two choices: I can hang back and see what he decides to do or I can speed up and reach for the door before he gets the chance. I’ve gone both ways here. Usually I make the decision at the very last moment using my keen peripheral vision to quickly assess his cultural values, upbringing and emotional state of mind.
This anecdote leads onto a larger discussion of the roles that men and women assume in society now. Feminism has rightly taken tremendous strides to empower women but has also taken away some of the traditional male roles. This leaves the modern, younger man in a bit of a state, procrastinating on whether it is alright to open the door, pull up a chair, escort safely home the modern woman. Angela goes on to say that women deplore the lack of manliness in today’s men and that men should take back their battered masculinity and be men again.
The second article struck me because it’s something that I’ve seen so often in my life: it’s where a guy uses their niceness to cover their insecurities. This, as the article says, often descends into weinerdom. I couldn’t put it better myself. Instead of being the nice guy or an utter bastard, the article suggests an alternative: the extremely confident gentleman.
The extremely confident gentleman? I didn’t know there was such a thing! This article said that it was ok to be a nice guy; you just have to back it up with confidence. This was a great insight for me because I genuinely don’t like arseholes or being an arsehole and I’d felt that on some level a man needed some arseholeness in order to be attractive to ladies. Instead, the article listed what it took to be a confident gentleman:
Be a leader and a decision maker-not a push-over.
Be ambitious.
Have a cool man skill or hobby.
Be supremely confident about your relationship.
Be supremely confident and comfortable in your own skin.
I lack all of these attributes so I was both a kid in a candy store and a depressive, angsty teenager. A candy store kid because I had finally found the Everlasting Gobstopper, and a depressive teen because of the time and journey I would have to undertake in order to acquire these attributes. I groaned.
I groaned even more when I read Steve Pavlina’s “How to Be a Man” again. It’s a fantastic article:
A man doesn’t adopt a confident posture because he knows he’ll succeed. He often knows that failure is a likely outcome. But when the odds of success are clearly against him, he still exudes confidence. It isn’t because he’s ignorant or suffering from denial. It’s because he’s proving to himself that he has the strength to transcend his self-doubt. This builds his courage and persistence, two of his most valuable allies.
Wow.
My open-mindedness (or is it just my passivity?) has contributed to my lack of manliness, as I “empower” the woman by letting them make decisions, whereas the articles above state that men who make the decisions empower the women! It relates to Steve Pavlina’s point that a man must be the giver of love i.e. he must be proactive. In fact, most of Steve’s article is about being proactive. I am the embodiment of the reactive man. And that is why I need to Be a Man.